Thursday, August 27, 2015

Copyright; content creation and theft.


This will primarily focus on image theft, but can just as easily be applied to any content – digital or physical. Artist is proven to enhance society and culture, yet the theft of artistic content – writing, video, photographic, drawn, digitally created – whatever the medium, is reducing the number of artists, and therefore works, available to our culture.

Once over the theft of images was pretty rare and was usually carried out by people wanting a nice screensaver, but I have noticed in recent years that the theft has become more blasé.

A photographer friend of mine, rather gifted in Equestrian photography, was the first victim I can recall knowing personally. His images were not only stolen by another photographer, but the thief would also remove my friend’s copyright and watermark, replacing them with his own. Even the thief’s logo mimicked my friend’s. Just when my friend felt he had that under control a well-known magazine published an image belonging to him without consent or payment.

A few years ago digital content was lifted directly from a sports website that I know. This time it was video – an exclusive interview, and rather distinctive. I then spotted the still of the video on another sports site, there was no crediting given, no link back to the source, and I knew that the second sports site had not sought permission from the first to use a still.

Last week a large TV company had one of their exclusive video interviews not only lifted from their website, but the logo on the top of the screen was covered over and a transcript of the interview published. Despite the well-known interviewer the thief-site still did not credit the TV Company until they were challenged.

Finally this week I discovered via Pixsy.com that I was a victim of this same fraud, not once, not twice but 11 times! Given that I have over 3000 images on my websites this is a remarkably low number, however spread over more than 5 years it has cost me more than £30,000 in lost revenue. While I have been struggling to make ends meet others have been earning more than £87,739.67 per week using just one of my images on their website.

I'm Studying ... Honest

The challenge now remains to get payment for past use of these images and to either licence them going forward or have the images taken down with immediate effect should those using the images illegally not wish to pay any further.

My first port of call will always be to contact the offender and invoice them for the usage so far. I will also always offer an option of licence for future time or take the content down voluntarily. If they do not want to licence going forward, and do not take the content down I issue a DMCA takedown notice to the web host, forcing the content removal.

If the offender ignores the invoice, or acknowledges the theft but still refuses to pay I am not afraid to use all legal avenues to pursue thieves and recover monies. I have an excellent team of IP solicitors who recover their fees from the individuals concerned regardless of the country they are in.

Bleeding Rose

So will these thefts stop me putting my images onto my websites?

Well, no. I am a very good photographer. I have a natural eye – I have never been trained. I need to live, I need to pay my bills, I need to support my family. I have professional equipment and legal insurance to pay for. To live I need to sell my work and my service. To make sales I need to advertise.

It is worth noting that I take every precaution to prevent theft of my work. All images contain a watermark, all images contain the copyright status ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, all images have EXIF data with my contact details, location the image was loaded to, ownership, creation date, copyright information, etc.

Usage and Licencing


The use of photographic images is a complex one. Most photographers I know are extremely reasonable and negotiate usage rights and charges when they are contacted before the image is used. For example; I was approached by a sub section of a large charity and asked if they could have an image I took at one of their events. There were a number of factors I took in to the decision I made to allow them one of my images in exchange for credit and copyright notification without charge (with other limitations).

Another exception is my significant other, a sports journalist. He has access to my sports images for his website without charge as it is in the family interest to ensure that we both make a good living to support us all, but even he still has to credit and copyright me.

On one of my sites, and on my Getty page, those looking to use an image can use an online calculator to get an idea of the cost of licencing the image. I believe in fair and clear licencing.

Photographers face enough drain on their income with hobbyists taking images for free and giving them away, without having their own images stolen.

If you still don’t believe it is fair to pay someone to use content they have created I have a few suggestions;

  •  See if the photographer has loaded the image to a stock photography site (these can be cheaper than buying direct)
  • Ask a hobbyist to recreate the image for you (assuming that the image creation isn’t IP protected)
  • Recreate the photo yourself (see above codicil)
  • Find another image that you like which someone is willing to give away
However if the image is so good you have to have it and nothing else will do, even if it means stealing it, then it is more than good enough to pay for. Contact the artist and talk to them.

Until content and digital theft becomes as unpalatable as drink driving, or smoking in a confined public space this battle will continue to rage, with those found to be stealing content facing heavy bills. Companies such as Pixsy.com and Intellectual Property law firms will become content creators first port of call rather than last.

Thursday, July 9, 2015

See Me Exposure Award 2015

See|Me Exposure Award 2015: Finalist!


Earlier this year I entered the annual See|Me Exposure Award, and I did it on a whim. I never planned or intended to enter, but I had an image that I thought was excellent, and then I received an email about the competition and thought "Why not?".

So I submitted and forgot all about it.




Next thing I know I have an email saying it has been selected as a finalist in the "Black & White Collection" and will be displayed in The Louvre, Paris.

Now I am quite cynical so didn't take this on face value. In fact I emailed back and asked if they were telling me that my art would DEFINITELY be on display in this world renown art gallery. Back came the reply "Yes, and you will receive certification to this effect".

That was it! I told my family, who were thrilled for me! My partner said we should have a copy printed and display it. So we did.

People who have seen it have asked if I am going to sell prints. After some thought I decided to have a Limited Edition print run of 150.

75 Small
70 Medium
5 Large.

People started pre-ordering before I had my meeting with my printers.

I have always believed that art should be shared, and that everyone should have the opportunity to own their own piece of art. That is why the prints start at £70. All prints are mounted, but not framed. Each is signed by me, numbered, certified by the printers as a genuine of the print run and was displayed in The Louvre on 13th July 2015 as a finalist in the See|Me Exposure Award 2015.